Yup a real horrible problemBeing "stuck" with one of if not the best all around dslr ever made is not a horrible problem to have...![]()
If you would like to post, you'll need to register. Note that if you have a BCG store account, you'll need a new, separate account here (we keep the two sites separate for security purposes).
Yup a real horrible problemBeing "stuck" with one of if not the best all around dslr ever made is not a horrible problem to have...![]()
They’ll leave the price and just put out a mark II for a grand more in a year, lol.I think the price tag is an apology to the Nikon faithful. And maybe a welcome home to some. Or a decent meal and a shower to us hostages. If it truly a hit I wouldn't be at all surprised if the price increases after a few months.
Or they’ll put a hefty price tag on the more exciting firmware updates.They’ll leave the price and just put out a mark II for a grand more in a year, lol.
This is what I was going to order, is it the wrong one? I thought it could read both the Z9 Type B and the D500 SD cards I use.
No it is not backward compatible for xQD per the info at the link you posted.Yes, that's fine.
No it is not backward compatible for xQD per the info at the link you posted.
This is what I was going to order, is it the wrong one? I thought it could read both the Z9 Type B and the D500 SD cards I use.
and when would the warranty period begin?Also don't forget that if you use your credit card to pay, by the time the item is delivered(or if it's not delivered) you may have exceeded the time frame for seeking recourse through the bank/card company.
Good question. It typically starts on the date on the bill of sale. Logically the warranty could hardly start if the camera wasn't even manufactured yet when it was paid for? Where's a lawyer when you need one?and when would the warranty period begin?
One thing to know about Delkin. Their cards run cooler than most. Also their "POWER" line should be identical performance to the "BLACK" line. The black line is just tougher build (like Sony Tough) but as far as I know the internals are the same and Power are cheaper. I've owned Power CFe-B and Power SD V90 and they are great cards.
Re Delkin, the Black says sustained minimum write while the Power says Maximum write. Could I assume that the Power should be ok for short raw bursts and a minute of 8k 30P ?? Just want to make sure that I have a suitable card in hand before the Z9 is delivered. Thanks.
I wasn't clear. I was referring to it needing to be a CF Express Type B card reader, not a CF Express Type A card reader.
Animal / Bird eye AF shown here with various examples:
Another excellent review with plenty of footage.
Around the 29th minute mark the photographer shows samples of Osprey flight shots with 500 pf attached to a 1.4 x tc.
The 4k 120 FPS can also be shot with a 2.3x crop! That's great for shooting wildlife video especially of static subjects.
Incredible! The 500 PF owners are in for a treat for sure. The entire osprey in flight series he shows is shot with a 500pf with the 1.4tc attached. I know with the previous z cameras the 500pf with 1.4 was ok for static subjects but this one truly brings the best out of the PF. Also, he shows an image and a handheld video at 2000 plus mm, where he uses a 500pf with 2x Tc and a 2.3 crop at 4k 120p.
The Z9 Brochure states "When using ProGrade Digital COBALT 1700R 325GB cards. Up to approx. 3 seconds of 20-fps high-speed continuous shooting is possible in RAW + JPEG or JPEG + JPEG."
No, Matt G got over 1000 on High Efficiency Raw and almost 600 on the other High raw, so I would guess closer to 100-200 on lossless. He will post a new video next week. The Cobalt 325 is min 1500 write, a Delkin 128 is 1710 so that's even more. Also, that was plus jpeg, raw alone would get more. And one more thought, since there is no internal buffer and it is dependent on the card, newer tech and newer cards make the buffer longer with time.So basicaly, you will get between 40 and 60 shots RAW, even with the fast cards.
1000+ shots only in High Efficiency RAW
I know that may can't
Interesting comments revealing the Z9 has not achieved cold fusion and indeed has to follow the same laws of physics we mere mortals do. His comments were interesting about the processor having to run the autofocus, the EVF, the analog to digital conversion, and write out 45 megapixels. The R3 punted on the number of megapixels, I don't know what the A1 compromised on. No mechanical shutter, that is a giant leap.I was thinking a lot whether to post this link or not... but here it is... Especialy because he did not have a camera in hands.
If you can get past by the mean tone and the rant (I know that many can't),
it might be that he is correct about some things and why the buffer performance (in large/lossless RAW)is not as expected...
Hopefully High Efficiency RAW would be almost the same quality... In that case this would be a non issue...
Some of the video reviews show it being used.
My wife walking by as I watched this thought I was listening to Jerry Seinfeld. My takeaway is that mine will be here sooner than I anticipated because they won’t be selling many Z9’s.I was thinking a lot whether to post this link or not... but here it is... Especialy because he did not have a camera in hands.
If you can get past by the mean tone and the rant (I know that many can't),
it might be that he is correct about some things and why the buffer performance (in large/lossless RAW)is not as expected...
Hopefully High Efficiency RAW would be almost the same quality... In that case this would be a non issue...
I am happy the Z9 is hear at last, however.....
All i want is the focus tracking to be at least as sticky as Sony or Canon, i have suspicion its just a little behind.
All i want is accurate colour
High Dynamic Range
Quality high ISO
Total shutter silence as an option
Tiff format
5/4 format
Excellent focusing.
Genuine speed
Fast focus acquisition
Lighter weight than a D5
FX lens compatibility
Some of these things may or may not exist.
I also feel it needs to be in the streets a little, first runs always have some issues, sorry its based on history.
Oz down under